US: PUB LTE: Constitution is
Drug War's Top Casualty

Newshawk: Uncle Hempy unclehempy@hotmail.com
Pubdate: May 18-24, 1998
Source: Source: Washington Times (Weekly Edition)
Contact: nated@wt.infi.net
Author:
Note:

US: PUB LTE: Constitution is Drug War's Top Casualty

They say it's never to late to say you're sorry, but I think that depends on the personal ( and public) price paid for the transgression in question. The "war on drugs" has cost far too much both to the "criminals" who've paid with their lives, their liberty, and their forfeited property and to the American people who've paid with their tax dollars, their loss of privacy and their liberty.

The war on drugs is absolutely no more legitimate than a war on alcohol would have been without the 18th Amendment-later repealed-because:

a)The masses generally ignored it because they liked to drink and didn't consider it a crime.

b) Prohibition had given birth to massive criminal enterprises, well organized and on a scale such as had never been seen before in a free America, complete with black markets, widespread police and political corruption, violent gangs, bigger government, and the first drive-by shootings.

Recently, Newt Gingrich and other politicians have been rattling their sabers and talking about ratcheting up the drug war, likening it to World War II, and constantly invoking the "save the children" mantra. They've even jumped on the tired old lapel ribbon bandwagon ( blue this time).

I have no problem with the ribbon idea -- a bit stale, maybe, but at least it's voluntary. What I cannot tolerate are those who swear an oath to protect and defend our way of life, and then turn to unconstitutional legislation or executive fiat to "send a message."

We don't need messages, we need our Founding Principles back. How much more money and freedom are we willing to lose? How much more government intrusion and unaccountability will we put up with? We should know by now that to stay in power government needs an enemy. What's next after drugs, when we have a full-blown police state? Tobacco? Guns? It has to be something.

No, Prohibition in the '20's didn't work. The law of unintended consequences carried the day. But at least it was constitutional.

Michael A. Feldman
Shelby Township, Michigan

[ To Al's Info Menu | To End The War On Drugs ]

Updated 98/09/05 by webmaster@vote-al.org ----- Built, hosted, and maintained by kryo.com